William J. Acton, Senior Partner at Advancement Partners
Getting everyone pulling in the same direction makes for an effective committee. It's just that we don't always do a good job establishing that direction from the get-go.
One of the biggest challenges school advancement directors face is establishing and leading a genuinely effective advancement committee. Committees are too often without purpose, established because board bylaws require them. They are usually populated with board members (and others) who, while well-meaning and earnest in their desire to help…don't know anything – at all – about advancement.
Except…usually the advancement committee has at least one member who believes he or she knows the absolute best way to "do" advancement. (See our earlier blog on volunteers who operate in this way). And staff provides little or no direction on what it is the advancement committee is supposed to do. As a result, in the week ahead of a scheduled advancement committee meeting, panic sets in. "What are we supposed to be doing at this meeting?"
Raise your hand if you've been to this advancement committee meeting:
The meeting starts with the advancement director handing out a report on giving results – the golf outing, the raffle, the annual fund to date. Then the director reads the report. There is some dreadful silence and then some irrelevant questions asked ("Have we thought about doing the outing at a different golf course next year?”). Discussion morphs into a free flow of ideas on fundraising ("What if we added a car wash?” or "Shouldn't we charge an entrance fee for our Cookies with Santa event?”). And the advancement director and staff spend time fending off these ideas or, worse, writing them down and offering confirmation of their brilliance. The final 15 minutes of the meeting are then devoted to scheduling the next meeting.
Too often, really good, smart and well-meaning people leave the meetings wondering, "What did we accomplish there?” There are a couple of very big – and fixable – reasons why the advancement committee ends up generating more frustration than effectiveness.
First…we don't put much thought into who we put on the committee. Everyone (negatively) compares the advancement committee's effectiveness with that of the finance or facilities or curriculum committees. But that's because those committees are populated with people who are experts in their assigned areas – CPAs and construction company owners and high school academics. But we populate our advancement committee with the "left over” board members in need of a committee placement. Where do we put the doctor? Or the widget maker? Or the Dad's Club president? The advancement committee, of course!
Second…we don't do a good job of clearly articulating the purpose of the committee – something we do pretty well for those three other committees mentioned above. Of course, it is easier to wrap your arms around finances and facilities for those committees. It may be a little trickier to do so with things like curriculum, marketing and the student experience for those committees, but it's doable. But it's seemingly impossible to clearly message what we want the advancement committee to do – and NOT do. Do they talk about reunions? Social media? Student fundraisers? Grandparents Day? OF COURSE! Shouldn't we talk about the right hashtags to use in our fundraising messages as well as the box lunch menus for the Golden Years' reunion? Absolutely!
Third…we don't orient or on-board the committee. There are certain things we want and need from an effective committee. We need their passion for the school and commitment to its mission. We need committee members to champion the school and the advancement department. We need them to understand what it is we are trying to accomplish as a school and as a department. We need them to partner with us to establish realistic, albeit "stretch,” goals and benchmarks. They need to understand what's doable – from a personnel, budget and time allocation standpoint. That means understanding how the department functions, how it is staffed, what its budget is, and what are the "best practices” in school advancement.
Into the void of not knowing, committee members usually toss in their own ideas and understandings of fundraising, many of which are completely wrong for a high school. Many bring ideas executed by their university alma maters (schools with budgets and staffs that are 5X yours) or parishes (where chicken dinners and raffles still reign supreme). As well-meaning as this input is, it's not helpful. What you DON'T need from an advancement committee are ideas about raising money. What you also don't need – and shouldn't require – is help raising money. You don't need them to "bring prospects to the table” or solicit friends or colleagues. The era of peer-to-peer solicitation in schools is long past, and after all…isn't that the job of the school president and advancement staff?
But at the same time, you can't just waste committee members' time by making the meetings nothing more than a series of reports by staff. What is their purpose in that regard?
So how do you make an advancement committee helpful, impactful? Simple, yet important steps:
Getting everyone pulling in the same direction makes for an effective committee. It's just that we don't always do a good job establishing that direction from the get-go. But once you achieve that, and with maybe four formal meetings per year that stay focused on your objectives, you'll start to see a productive and supportive advancement committee.
Posted on: January 5, 2024